cooljeanius’s avatarcooljeanius’s Twitter Archive—№ 50,961

    1. So yeah this is bad; way overbroad interpretation of the takings clause. The government isn’t actually “taking” by giving union organizers access to property. #1u @subscriptlaw/1407708999647178756
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo cooljeanius’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets Mood -2 🙁
  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
    …but I guess if the SCOTUS is going to interpret it that way, I’m team #RepealTheTakingsClause now.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo cooljeanius’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      ...or, maybe instead of repealing it entirely, just define what "just compensation" means a bit more specifically to clarify that economic justice requires an element of benefiting the poor more than the rich (see Rawls' 2nd principle of justice)
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo cooljeanius’s avatar Mood +4 🙂
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        Update: poll on the various options on Mastodon now: @cooljeanius/1680277575128547328
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo cooljeanius’s avatar Mood 0