cooljeanius’s avatarcooljeanius’s Twitter Archive—№ 52,377

                      1. It’s videoconference season; this one starts tonight and is also tomorrow: @Blaine_Volpe/1420846961188646916
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                      unlike with last night’s event, I don’t think I’m going to bother compiling my own #TwitterList of people’s handles for this one…
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    .@layla_says greeting us now
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  OK so the #2021FutureSummit today and tomorrow is apparently a bipartisan one, whereas the #StatehouseFutures one yesterday was more progressives-specific
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                I might not make it through this one; if I have to be respectful to Republicans despite all the evil they do, oppression they’re responsible for, and harm that they cause, well, that’s a rule I’ll have a hard time following.
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              When the party lines are literally between good and evil as they currently are, engaging across those lines only serves to ruin people’s moral clarity by introducing the confusion of relativism. Both sides are NOT equivalent.
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            On the contrary, Democrats winning their policy proposals do in fact make the nation as a whole win, and Republicans winning their policy proposals do in fact make the nation as a whole lose. So yes, winning does actually matter.
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          The only place for this whole “better arguments” thing is for where the sides are like, 2 separate DSA caucuses, not our present parties
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        We’re not just throwing around ideas in the abstract here; ideas have consequences. As Carl von Clausewitz said, ”War is the continuation of politics by other means.” The state has a monopoly of violence, & by enacting state policy, we’re choosing who gets violence enacted on ‘em
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      So of COURSE arguments are going to be contentious. It’d be disconnected from reality if they weren’t, and we should stop trying to pretend otherwise.
  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
    ok so that’s it for today; I’ll do a new thread for tomorrow