cooljeanius’s avatarcooljeanius’s Twitter Archive—№ 52,842

                    1. Dang it, I meant to do stuff before tonight’s #DSAConvention debate block, but didn’t manage to… oh well. Last night’s thread, for reference: @cooljeanius/1423386371188740103?s=21
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    ok the Zoom session is kicking off now
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  debating amendments to amendments! You’d think serving in one legislative body would have me got me tired enough of legislative procedure, but nope, I guess I didn’t learn my lesson…
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                First up is a constitution & bylaws amendment to strike regional requirements from the charter. Undecided on this; will listen to debate.
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              .@HondaWang speaking in favor of CB1; it’s so weird hearing socialists making fiscally conservative arguments, lol (that’s not necessarily a critique, btw!)
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            Reminder to #PassthePROAct about these union support concerns
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          I’m confused by this whole amendment-to-an-amendment thing
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        I might just abstain here
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      tech issues leading to a (possible) recess
  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
    ok sounds like we’re back
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      I think CB1 passed; onto CB5, on electing DSA’s national leadership
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        CB5 seems pretty reasonable; I’m leaning towards it… I can see there being an argument against it based on being tired of voting on stuff, but if I don’t want to vote on stuff in the future, I just won’t. Abstention is always an option.
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          Motion to divide; ugh…
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            motion to divide failed, so we’re voting on CB5 as a whole next. I’m still leaning in favor of it; democracy is good.
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              Next is CB4, on electing DSA’s National Director. I think I’ll vote yes on this one, too.
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                The argument that “this isn’t a politicized position” goes against my view that EVERYTHING is politicized; there’s no such thing as a non-political position.
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  and, as I argued on the previous motion, if you’re tired of there being too many elections (which is a valid complaint), just don’t vote in them. No one’s forcing you to vote in all these new votes being created.
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    While we’re voting on CB4, results for CB5 are back: it failed. Oh well, whatever, I didn’t really care that much anyways.
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                      next up are the NPC recommendations
                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                        CB4 fails, too
                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                          This recommendation on state-level organizing sounds good
                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                            NPC1-R1 passes on acclamation
                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                              undecided on NPC2-R2, on growing DSA staff
                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                now discussing NPC3-R3, on standardization of committees… undecided on this as well
                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                  Stuff passes on acclamation. We’ve hit the end of the block and are motioning to recess now.
                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                    OK we’re done. I’ll be back with a new thread tomorrow. #DSACon2021