cooljeanius’s avatarcooljeanius’s Twitter Archive—№ 58,278

                                                                                                1. MCG hearing thread for Jan 31, 2022 starts here... #NHPolitics
                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                Peter Somssich is introducing HB1374 to us, relative to the membership of local land use boards... seems familiar from previously this term...
                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                            ok reason it's allowed to come back this year is because it died in the House without getting a vote
                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                          David Meuse on HB392 last year: @JdmMeuse/1368958290974105602
                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                        Natch Greyes this year is taking the role Cordell Johnston played last year: @cooljeanius/1368949098427146248
                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                      next bill, HB1375, is going to be amending this: gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/i/21/21-50.htm
                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                    Diane Pauer is introducing HB1375 to us since @T_RoyNHStateRep isn't here; it's about the definition of "veteran" (specifically about discharge under honorable/dishonorable conditions)
                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                  William... uh... (unsure about spelling of last name) has testimony for us in favor of HB1375
                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                Gaudreau is his last name... he's William Gaudreau
                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                            apparently there's a difference between "general discharge under honorable conditions" and "honorable discharge" (law is so confusing)
                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                          Kevin Grady (a Hooksett veteran) is here representing a state veteran thing to testify in favor of of HB1375
                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                      Jim... Michaud(?) (Hudson assessor) is testifying as neutral on this bill
                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                    Rep. Deshaies is here to introduce HB1056 to us, relative to a tax credit for veterans
                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                  basically it's just a bill to adjust some numbers for inflation, and to remove a 90-day service requirement for qualification for the credit
                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                Jim Michaud is back to be neutral on this bill, as well... just giving some numbers...
                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                              I think I'd support a version of this bill that just does the inflation tweaks for the "may" portion and drops both the changes to the "shall" portion and the removal of the 90 days requirement
                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                            Maura Ryan, a veteran, has testimony in favor of HB1056
                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                          next is HB1057, about the tax exemption for the elderly. It's similar to HB1056, except it's for the elderly instead of veterans. Rep. Deshaies is introducing this one, as well.
                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                        I'm leaning to oppose this one; we have enough old people in the state already and don't need to be encouraging more to move here
                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                      reminder to feel free to notify me of any hearings I ought to attend later in the day while I'm livetweeting one of my own (small break now)
                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                    Next is HB1342, about municipal tax caps. It's basically to clean up after the mess left behind by last year's bill on municipal tax caps. Rep. @SuzanneVailNH is introducing it to us.
                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                  excuse me, it's not just tax caps, but spending caps, too. Last year the bill that made the mess of it was SB52: @cooljeanius/1394279909753769985
                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                funny how the blue sheet numbers are basically the reverse of the ones from SB52; majorities opposed both despite the two going in opposite directions: @cooljeanius/1394287822123700230
                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                              SB52 was a party-line vote: @cooljeanius/1394341264049442822
                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                            Julie Smith (with a "The Constitution Matters" shirt) is giving inflammatory testimony against HB1342 theonion.com/area-man-passionate-defender-of-what-he-imagines-consti-1819571149
                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                          Reference to Fred Teeboom from the SB52 hearing: @cooljeanius/1394283974353108995
                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                        Julie Smith is a "Big Lie" pusher and believes the voting machines are rigged against her preferences
                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                      small break again before next bill
                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                    Next is HB1350, relative to the procedure for valuation of property for property tax purposes
                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                  The bill's prime sponsor, @Ross_Berry, isn't here, so Rep. Pauer introduced it instead (I've missed the hearing for a bill that I was supposed to introduce, too, so I'm not holding this against him... scheduling can be difficult, and hearing notices can get lost in email)
                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                Kathryn Heck of the NHMA has testimony for us opposed to HB1350
                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                              Jim Michaud is back to answer a question intended for Ms. Heck
                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                            lunch break time
                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                          The @Gunstockmtn bill will be after lunch... been getting a lot of emails about that one, so it ought to be interesting!
                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                        Ok back from lunch; Norm Silber is here to introduce the extremely unpopular HB1078 to us (i.e. the @Gunstockmtn bill). We got a petition with 1200 signatures on it opposing it in the email this morning. It wants to have Belknap County take over the Gunstock Area Commission.
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    credit rating agencies like @MoodysInvSvc have too much power IMO
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  Rusty McClear of Meredith is now testifying... uh... he's taking a bit to get to whether he supports or opposes the bill...
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                ok it sounds like he's opposing the bill; he's speaking in support of how well Gunstock has been doing lately
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              name is actually Edward "Rusty" McLear; I put an extra "C" in there previously...
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            Alan J. Posnack of Alton Bay is here as a skier to testify against HB1078
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          Gary Kiedaisch (pronounced "kay-dish") had some pretty lengthy testimony for us in opposition to HB1078
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        I'm having a hard time continuing to take notes on this...
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      (just tired is all)
  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
    Last testimony: Tom Day of Gilford; now: a Katherine White, also of Gilford
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      (they both oppose HB1078 btw) Anyways, here's a screenshot of a list of Gunstock Area Commissioners, from their website:
      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        The Gary Kiedasch who testified earlier:
        oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          Rusty McLear's bio page from the Gunstock website:
          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            Brian Gallagher ("h" in the last name, so no relation) opposes HB1078
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              interesting to see how the pro-business wing of the GOP splits from the more radical Free Staters on this bill
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                Rep. Raymond Howard Jr. (Belknap 8) is one of the cosponsors of this bill, and is now testifying in support of it (first support after a long string of opposition)
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  oh hey I thought I recognized his name: @deanbarker/1343571637933899783
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    No Twitter handle, apparently: @charles_gaba/1343587727791550464
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                      Rep. Tim Lang is testifying against HB1078; he's also from Belknap County
                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                        his handle is @tlangsr for reference
                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                          Chair Dolan explaining to the rather-large audience gathered here the difference between hearings and executive sessions; there will likely be interest in the vote...
                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                            small break before exec-ing a different bill
                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                              OK we're back for executive session on HB1665, the municipal roads & bridges disaster relief fund bill from last week. There's an amendment to it that we're voting on first.
                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                Amendment OTPs unanimously, 15-0 (there are some absences today)
                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                  full bill as amended passes by the same margin; might not be able to go onto the consent calendar due to having a fiscal note, though...
                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                    ok adjourning now; we will be back for more hearings Thursday and Friday (I'm double-booked Friday, though, so I'll probably go to my county delegation subcommittee instead, since it appears we won't be exec-ing anything in MCG on Friday)