-
My committee (MCG) is in Executive Session today; hopefully we get through our bills in a relatively reasonable fashion... (thread starts here)Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
"2/22/22" doesn't sound as cool if you pronounce it "two twenty-two twenty-two" instead of "two-two-two-two-two"Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
first bill: HB1026, which... well, since the "may" seems to be staying "may" (instead of switching to "shall"), seems finePermalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
HB1026 OTPs unanimously; goes on the consent calendarPermalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
HB1055 up now; it's always confusing with bills with amendments whether to talk about the amendment or the bill as a whole...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
HB1055 and its amendment both pass along party lines, 10-9. Onto HB1056, another one of these tax credit tweaks.On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
oh right I forgot to include the #NHPolitics hashtag at the top of this thread; doing that once here and then forgetting about it again...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
we probably should have raised this point about needing a Fiscal Note on the previous bill, too...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
HB1056 passes along party lines, 10-9; hope we can get the FN request in quicker on the next one...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
gah process is confusing; @nhhouseclerk come help us out in LOB 301-303 herePermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
looks like we have to do a motion to reconsider first in order to get Fiscal Notes on the bills we already voted on?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
this is like one of the first motions to reconsider I've heard where we're actually reconsidering somethingPermalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
motion to reconsider HB1055 passes unanimouslyPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
process is still confusingPermalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
maybe @NHSpeaker can give us some process guidance if @nhhouseclerk can't? Current status is that the motion to reconsider on HB1055 just passed; I think that puts us back in the state of reconsidering the previous OTP/A motion?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
uh... moving on to HB1069 I guess?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Rep. Rung has an amendment to change HB1069 from just being about Belknap County to be about all counties.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
wish we could have had more discussion on HB1069 before voting on it, but anyways, both the amendment and the bill itself passed unanimously, 10-9. Anyways now the clerk is here to help us with our Fiscal Notes questions...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂
-
oops screwed up my note-taking here; I think I swapped my “9” and “0”… (i.e. it ought to read “unanimously, 19-0”)Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -4 🙁
-
sounds like the process going forward could kind of depend on how the results of the Fiscal Note come out... (i.e. whether it goes to another committee or not could depend on whether the Fiscal Note says it'll affect state revenues or appropriations, or just shift local burdens)Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
second time around with OTP/A, the motion fails, 17-2... and apparently we're going straight to ITL instead of requesting a Fiscal Note?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -1 🙁
-
motion of ITL passes 18-1Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
reconsidering HB1056 nextPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
motion to reconsider HB1056 passes 18-1... If only @nhrepPorter were still on this committee to keep everyone in line on process...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
after reconsidering, have to go back to the original motion, so the second OTP motion for 1056 (after reconsideration) passes, 18-1... onto the ITL motion...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
ITL for HB1056 passes by the same margin, tooPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
apologies to the sponsors of these bills for our procedural mess; it's not really *their* fault the bills didn't get Fiscal Notes, but rather that of the Fiscal Note assigner...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
HB1057 we didn't even take a first vote on, so no need to reconsider here, we can just go straight to ITL (it's the 3rd and final of the 3 tax bills that were part of this bundle)Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
HB1057 is ITL-ed unanimously; onto HB1078, the @Gunstockmtn billPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
there's an amendment to HB1078 that we're waiting to be printedPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
amendment pretty much guts the bill, replacing it with a single sentence, which seems... better? But no one heard the amendment, though; all the commentary was on the underlying bill, so... idk if the amendment would satisfy all of them...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Amendment passes along party lines, 10-9; even though I thought the amendment was an improvement, I voted against it anyways, on the grounds that it wasn't enough of a fix, and hadn't received enough attention as the underlying bill; assuming other Dems reasoned similarlyPermalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
anyways the amendment is moot now, since we voted to ITL it even with the amendment, unanimously, 19-0.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
skipping ahead to HB1087, about single-family zoning. I oppose single-family zoning, and this bill would restrict it, so I support this bill!Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
HB1087 is ITL-ed mostly along party lines, 11-8 (Rep. Klee voted with the Republicans, I'm guessing probably because her part of Nashua has a lot of single-family zoning)... lunch break now.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Lunch break is over; back for HB1098... there's an amendment that basically just inserts the word "on-street" before "parking"Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
wait make that "off-street" not "on-street"Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
amendment to HB1098 fails 16-2Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
apparently you "adopt" amendments, instead of "passing" themPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
HB1098 is ITL-ed 17-1; I was the "1" but won't object to it going on the consent calendarPermalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
Next: HB1070, on default budgets for official ballot jurisdictions... there's an amendment to this one, too; it just un-strikes-out a portion that wasn't supposed to be strickenPermalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
amendment to HB1070 gets a tie vote, 9-9 (Rep.MacDonald, the usual comments clerk has left, creating an absence; Rep. Maggiore is taking over clerking for him)... which I guess means the amendment is failed to be adopted...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
motion to ITL HB1070 passes, 10-8, which I guess means we got a GOP Rep. to join us? Missed who it was, though.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -1 🙁
-
Next is HB1119, to allow municipalities to regulate single-use plastic bags. Rep. Rung has an amendment to replace "to customers" with "at point of sale"Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
(either that or allow "and/or" as a valid legislative term)Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
distributive property of English language sentence construction: @cooljeanius/1493616968724852737Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
I think we're still supposed to be talking about the amendment, even though the conversation has shifted to the bill as a whole...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
props to Rep. Pauer for limiting her remarks to just the amendment, even when the rest of the committee has moved on to discussing the bill as a whole...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Amendment to HB1119 fails along party lines, 10-9; I guess the whole bill will go that way, too, then... (Rep. MacDonald is back to resume clerking, btw)Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
HB1119 as a whole is ITL-ed by the same margin, 10-9.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
HB1081 is being moved until tomorrow, so that we can adjourn now.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0