-
My committee (MCG) is in Executive Session today; hopefully we get through our bills in a relatively reasonable fashion... (thread starts here)
-
"2/22/22" doesn't sound as cool if you pronounce it "two twenty-two twenty-two" instead of "two-two-two-two-two"
-
first bill: HB1026, which... well, since the "may" seems to be staying "may" (instead of switching to "shall"), seems fine
-
HB1026 OTPs unanimously; goes on the consent calendar
-
HB1055 up now; it's always confusing with bills with amendments whether to talk about the amendment or the bill as a whole...
-
HB1055 and its amendment both pass along party lines, 10-9. Onto HB1056, another one of these tax credit tweaks.
-
oh right I forgot to include the #NHPolitics hashtag at the top of this thread; doing that once here and then forgetting about it again...
-
we probably should have raised this point about needing a Fiscal Note on the previous bill, too...
-
HB1056 passes along party lines, 10-9; hope we can get the FN request in quicker on the next one...
-
gah process is confusing; @nhhouseclerk come help us out in LOB 301-303 here
-
looks like we have to do a motion to reconsider first in order to get Fiscal Notes on the bills we already voted on?
-
this is like one of the first motions to reconsider I've heard where we're actually reconsidering something
-
motion to reconsider HB1055 passes unanimously
-
process is still confusing
-
maybe @NHSpeaker can give us some process guidance if @nhhouseclerk can't? Current status is that the motion to reconsider on HB1055 just passed; I think that puts us back in the state of reconsidering the previous OTP/A motion?
-
uh... moving on to HB1069 I guess?
-
Rep. Rung has an amendment to change HB1069 from just being about Belknap County to be about all counties.
-
wish we could have had more discussion on HB1069 before voting on it, but anyways, both the amendment and the bill itself passed unanimously, 10-9. Anyways now the clerk is here to help us with our Fiscal Notes questions...
-
oops screwed up my note-taking here; I think I swapped my “9” and “0”… (i.e. it ought to read “unanimously, 19-0”)