cooljeanius’s avatarcooljeanius’s Twitter Archive—№ 62,780

                                                                                1. NH House is in session today; I'm not really fully prepared for today, but let's see how it goes... Reminder I only include the #NHPolitics hashtag once per thread, and that I skip livetweeting things that I'm too slow for.
                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                .@DVCC2022 has been recruiting apparently; dunno if the people they've recruited have officially announced yet, so I won't steal their thunder...
                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                              we're supposed to be here until 6:30 or 7 tonight, and then as long as it takes tomorrow
                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                            ok time to get started
                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                          National Anthem today: student from Mascoma High
                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                        consent calendar adopted; onto the regular calendar, starting with Children & Family Law
                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                      SB144 is about child care scholarships. Child care is too expensive for many, so it would be good to do something about that. Let's pass it!
                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                    it would switch from attendance-based reimbursement for childcare to enrollment-based reimbursement for childcare... which makes sense, given COVID.
                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                  SB144 is ITL-ed on voice vote; onto SB326, to create an Office of Early Childhood. Rep. Pat Long is speaking in favor of passing it.
                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                Rep. Yokela is tongue-tiedly arguing that this bill is unnecessary
                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                              SB326 is ITL-ed along party lines; next is SB431, a bill changing child support
                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                            .@DebrasATeam speaks in favor of keeping child support in the best interests of the child.
                                                            oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                          Rep. Yokela thinks that child support is a wealth redistribution scheme, which, well, if it is, that would be a point in its favor, IMO. The more ways we can redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor, the better.
                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                        .@OmgEgan's voting station is still broken, apparently
                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                      SB431 passes along party lines
                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                    onto bills from Commerce & Consumer Affairs
                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                  first from this committee: SB202, which is about products tested on animals. Apparently it started as just being about cosmetics, but then got expanded to be about anything, including drugs, vaccines, etc.?
                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                apparently Republicans are trying to launder their anti-vax positions through under a guise of care for animals
                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                              SB202 is tabled by a wide margin
                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                            hey look a third committee that gets housing-related bills: apparently Commerce & Consumer affairs gets them, too, besides my committee (Municipal & County Government) and Judiciary... I still think we should have a single unified standing committee on housing, btw.
                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                          .@nhrepburroughs speaking in favor of SB319, about vaccination and wellness incentives.
                                          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                        Good points about preventive healthcare helping deal with the issue of the perverse incentives that exist with a sickness-based model of healthcare profits!
                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                      I don't get what Rep. Abramson is getting at with his questions here
                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                    "Who requested a roll call?" "Nobody!" "An invisible Republican!"
                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                  SB319 is ITL-ed along party lines; Republicans double down on their anti-vax extremism and continue to be dangers to public health.
                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                Next: SB355, which... hm, I'm kinda still undecided on this. It's supposed to cut down on online fraud, but I worry about privacy implications...
                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                              Support from police and businesses ought to be considered points against it, not in favor, IMO.
                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                            but then again it's some businesses against other businesses; if this is anti-Amazon legislation, then that's good.
                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                          yeah this Republican speaking in favor of interim study is making anti-government points; that makes me more likely to support an OTP motion instead.
                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                        If this were a true interim study motion, I'd support it, but it seems more like just a "nice" way of killing it, based on that Republican's speech...
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                      SB355 is referred to interim study; I hope it gets an actual interim study and comes back better next time.
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    Next: bills from Criminal Justice & Public Safety, starting with SB294, which is messing with recent bail reform efforts. Rep. Burt is motioning to table.
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  SB294 is tabled, which... well, that's good? Seems like the debate would have been a mess if it'd gone forward...
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                Next: SB299, relative to the penalty for escape.
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              uh... some stuff went by on voice vote that I missed... next: SB367 from Environment and Agriculture; I subbed in on a subcommittee work session on this one
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            Rep. Bixby speaking to his floor amendment to SB367
            oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        Bixby floor amendment is to incorporate feedback from @NHDES
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      Bixby floor amendment is adopted; now @MeganMurray4NH is speaking against the bill as a whole, because apparently the amendments, while good, didn't fix the bill enough, and there are still unanswered questions about advanced recycling that remain
      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
    yeah it was pretty complicated: @cooljeanius/1516463576365600779
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      SB367 passes; hope it turns out we're wrong to have concerns and that it does actually end up being safe...
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        more bills go by on voice vote
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          Current bill: SB274, an anti-union bill, prohibiting Project Labor Agreements; seems bad
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            ugh, "free market principles", drink
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              we managed to ITL SB274; good!
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                Next: SB325, defining some more people as "first responders". Seems kinda relevant to my pet rescue bill, which would do something with Disaster Animal Response Teams (DART) volunteers?
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  oops left out the word "similar"
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    ok SB325 passes by a wide margin; looks like we're breaking for lunch now
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                      ok we're back now; current bill is SB330
                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                        SB330 is a study committee on licensure
                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                          SB330 passes on voice vote; next is SB333, about licensure for case management service providers. Coincidentally, I am having to miss meeting with my own case manager today due to the House being in session...
                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                            Rep. Mike O'Brien has an amendment to put language from HB1417 into this bill, since the Senate killed that
                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                              so yeah this was HB1417: @cooljeanius/1509559662340939779
                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                lol apparently the "S" word in the House is "Senate"
                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                  O'Brien floor amendment is adopted! Good! Time to vote on SB333 as a whole now
                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                    Some confusion over whether Rep. Lekas was giving his PI about the right bill
                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                      SB333 passes; yay! Next: SB358, where the underlying bill declares October 2022 as eczema awareness month, but apparently it has some weird sort of amendment about the Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules (JLCAR, pronounced "Jailcar") attached to it
                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                        This was supposed to be a "listen to debate" bill but we only got one side of the debate, so... eh, whatever...
                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                          Next: SB382, something something licensure telehealth reciprocity medical services etc.
                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                            kinda confused as to whether this bill would be good or bad for telehealth services
                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                              kinda drifting now
                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                SB397: mental health compact
                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                  wait divisive concepts are coming up here what?
                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                    Republicans want to deny people mental health care because providers get diversity training
                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                      SB397 passes by a good margin; phew.
                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                        next: SB450, re: prescription drug affordability board
                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                          I swear "getting drugs from Canada" is one of those things that politicians always talk about, but then never actually happens; I've been hearing it since when I first started paying attention to politics two decades ago...
                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                            This bill (SB450) is basically Medicare price negotiations at the state level, which is a policy that polls hugely popularly nationwide
                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                              eyyy we managed to pass SB450 by a narrow margin; nice! Doing the "reconsider and vote no" dance now so it can't be reconsidered again later
                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                Next are a bunch of bills from Finance; they sent us a bunch of bills with unanimous votes that couldn't go on the consent calendar due to having Fiscal Notes, so they should mostly go by quickly on voice votes
                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                  oh wait Marjorie Smith is special-ordering something to now first
                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                    Motion is to special-order SB399 (ultrasound mandate repeal) to now, due to needing to make changes to it due to Alito's leaked SCOTUS opinion
                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                      motion to SB399 to now fails; looks like it'll have to wait until tomorrow
                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                        .@LWMcV moves to remove HB1674 from the table
                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                          wait huh I thought I'd tweeted about that one previously, but search isn't turning up any results...
                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                            .@DebrasATeam moves to remove CACR18 from the table
                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                              I was losing focus/energy when CACR18 came before us previously and didn't manage to go into detail about it previously: @cooljeanius/1504246376200343555
                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                motion to remove CACR18 from the table fails; looks like we won't be making any progress on dealing with the impending demise of Roe today...
                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                  ok back to all those bills from Finance
                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                    more bills becoming Christmas Trees via amendment
                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                      so yeah several bills just went by on voice vote; this next one (SB366, a preemptive audit for this year's elections) is going to have some actual debate, though
                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                        who knew a single scanner could end up costing $100K?
                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                          SB366 passes along party lines; Republicans continue to stoke election paranoia... back to more quick voice votes...
                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                            Current bill: SB381, establishing an office of the advocate for special education
                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                              Apparently the office might make more sense as part of the Office of the Child Advocate instead?
                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                onto the motion of OTP/A on SB381, Rep. Woodcock is speaking... uh... about iPhones? Apparently this is some sort of elaborate metaphor...
                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                  ok so apparently SB381 is like an iPhone bc it promises to solve all your problems, but doesn't actually. I... don't think people will really find that convincing? People generally like their iPhones... I mean, yeah, I agree that being stuck on the upgrade treadmill sucks, but...
                                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                    ...I don't think that's a widely-shared position, though...
                                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                      so SB381 passed; back to more things going by quickly on voice votes...
                                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                        Republicans are trying to add language from HB1337 to SB401 as an amendment: @cooljeanius/1504462792618917890
                                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                          Burt dash cams amendment. SB401 = another Christmas Tree
                                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                            am tired
                                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                              SB407: Medicaid/Medicare stuff
                                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                sounds like GOP is trying to sneak more bad anti-vax stuff in via amendment
                                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                  attendance seems to be dropping
                                                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                    SB417: electric school bus pilot program
                                                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                      you'd think that with Elon Musk getting more popular among Republicans, electric vehicles would be gaining great acceptance among them, too... guess not...
                                                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                        SB418: provisional ballots bill. It's bad; let's kill it.
                                                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                          welp... there goes our #FITN primary... (SB418 just passed)
                                                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                            SB420: education grants.
                                                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                              so it looks like my prediction that the bills from Finance would go by quickly on voice votes turned out to be a lie; Republicans had other plans with amendments
                                                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                somehow cosmetology licensing has something to do with procurement of American-made steel
                                                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                  if all these amendments are considered "germane" then we need to improve our definition of "germane"
                                                                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                    this whole idea of "if the Senate doesn't like our bills, then we'll just attach them as amendments to *their* (completely unrelated) bills" is just absurd
                                                                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                      uh... Rep. Deshaies is motioning to remove SB294 from the table... looks we couldn't actually have an easy time with that after all...
                                                                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                        ok SB294 stays on the table; phew
                                                                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                          Sike Mylvia
                                                                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                            We finally made it out of the Finance bills!!!!
                                                                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                              SB404: SNAP promotion bill
                                                                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                Third reading motion!
                                                                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                  yeah given how unanimous consent speeches have been going lately, I don't really feel like sticking around for them...