cooljeanius’s avatarcooljeanius’s Twitter Archive—№ 63,003

                                                                                                                                                                                    1. Here's today's negative test.
                                                                                                                                                                                      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                                                                                                                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                                    Meanwhile, statewide, we are still climbing the up-slope of the 5th wave.
                                                                                                                                                                                    oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                                                                                                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                                  I don’t really want to go to session today… I’m tired… but, I guess I have to…
                                                                                                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                                someone bring me caffeine at the State House today or something…
                                                                                                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                              Good thing it's possible to get here a few minutes late without missing much (just the prayer and anthem)
                                                                                                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                            so yeah this is day 2 of this week's crossover session; yesterday's thread was here: @cooljeanius/1521844432739446784
                                                                                                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                          Same disclaimers apply as usual, etc. etc.
                                                                                                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                        No idea how long we'll be this evening: @cooljeanius/1521847752782667781
                                                                                                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                      Memorial for Barbara French currently... who is a different person from Barbara Shaw! Hey wait Ms. French worked in the Concord Schools? Maybe I knew her...
                                                                                                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                    Oh and she's also a different person from Barb Griffin, who is still alive and still in office... "Barbara" seems to be almost as popular of a name for NH state legislators as "Tim" is
                                                                                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                  oh and "Steve" is another popular one, too... as is "Josh"
                                                                                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                                but yeah anyways we're considering bills now; current one is a suicide prevention bill
                                                                                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                              oh wait I guess that's not actually one for us to vote on
                                                                                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                            we're in bills from Judiciary now
                                                                                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                          Current bill: SB217, increasing the amount of time required for landlords to send eviction notices to tenants from 30 to 60 days. As a tenant, it's something I'd want (if I were in danger of getting evicted; thankfully that seems pretty hard to make happen with HUD housing)
                                                                                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                        SB217 is ITL-ed; looks like the House Landlord Caucus continues to rule the roost around here...
                                                                                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                      SB302: a personal privacy bill. Goes by on voice vote.
                                                                                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                    I don't think I included the #NHPolitics hashtag yet in this thread so I'll do so here and then forget about it again
                                                                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                  Current bill: SB344, about remote participation and the right-to-know law
                                                                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                                Now: SB388, which came out of committee unanimously, but apparently we're tabling now due to a floor amendment not getting drafted in time
                                                                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                              327-2! lol
                                                                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                            I challenge some #NHPolitics reporter to find out who the "2" were (It was a division, not a roll call, so they'll have to actually ask some people to find out)
                                                                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                          Done with bills from Judiciary; onto bills from the Labor Committee
                                                                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                        Now: SB345, establishing a maximum 35-hour workweek for 16 and 17-year-olds. It would have also set a limit on nightwork for kids, too, but the committee amendment just removed that part...
                                                                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                      Brian Sullivan is proposing a floor amendment putting back in the limit on nightwork on school nights for youth.
                                                                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                    Some commotion about making sure Rep. Seaworth speaks only to Rep. Sullivan's amendment, and not the entire bill.
                                                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                  "most of us have kids, some of us have grandkids" good grief the average age of this Legislature is too old; what about those of us who were recently kids ourselves?
                                                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                                Rep. Sullivan's floor amendment fails; @tjsnh moves to table
                                                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                              GOP are trying to bring back child labor
                                                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                            what level of dishonesty is it to say "we need to have a discussion on this bill!" (against tabling) and then immediately waving off debate after the motion to table fails?
                                                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                          SB345 passes; looks like the GOP gets their wish to bring back child labor... we'll be voting on a "print remarks" motion now
                                                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                        "print remarks" motion fails; Marjorie Smith reminds us that we can still find the debate by rewinding the YouTube stream
                                                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                      bills from my committee now!
                                                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                    good grief I thought this amendment would be non-controversial: @cooljeanius/1516058793678942220
                                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                  all it does is change "trash" to "waste"! I don't get why that would be controversial
                                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                                executive session results on the bill: @cooljeanius/1516065329599991808
                                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                              So that was my first PI!
                                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                            SB245 is tabled; onto SB246
                                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                          This was a Republican bill so I don't get why it's all Republicans opposing it: @cooljeanius/1512087487425888269
                                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                        Maybe it's just their general anti-regulation stance, in which case I guess the odd part is that a Republican introduced it in the first place, not that Republicans oppose it: @cooljeanius/1512088621993496581
                                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                      Reps Maggiore and Mangipudi continue to have their last names mixed up
                                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                    I thought Republicans were big private-community dwellers...
                                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                  Next is SB329; this is one of those bills that had random amendments added: @cooljeanius/1519320174314373120
                                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                                I hope we can kill the committee amendment: @cooljeanius/1519322218823565312
                                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                              Results from executive session on SB329: @cooljeanius/1519335905064009728
                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                            oops Rep. Maggiore just goofed his PI, lol
                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                          there is no need for tax cap language in this bill
                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                        boo, they got their tax cap amendment in... hopefully it gets removed in a committee of conference...
                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                      next: SB400, this one was even worsely amended
                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                    This was the main topic of my LTE printed yesterday: @cooljeanius/1521817780789690368
                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                  maneuvering is kinda complicated here; we don't want this tabled *yet*, but maybe later depending on which amendments pass...
                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                              it ended up being Republicans passing it due to their bad amendments they passed, but we haven't approved those as the Full House yet: @cooljeanius/1519350705190014979
                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                            this is also known as the "housing toolbox" bill: @cooljeanius/1519336648789708803
                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                          SB400 is tabled, oh well, so much for housing, but at least we managed to avoid the bad amendments...
                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                        That's it for my committee; onto SB258 from Resources, Recreation, and Development, relative to the graves of African Americans alive during the period of American enslavement.
                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                      motion is to put it to interim study, but we'd prefer to just pass it
                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                    Interim Study motion for SB258 passes; onto bills from Science Technology, and Energy
                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                  Rep. Jackie Cali-Pitts speaking in favor of a youth environmental education and conservation council (SB263)
                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                Now: SB269: a study commission for energy saving weatherization programs. It's a motion of "Interim Study"... on a study commission. Redundant much?
                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                              Now: SB271, relative to the Burgess BioPower facility. Apparently this is pretty important to the city of Berlin and the North Country in general.
                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                            Peter Somssich has a floor amendment to it that he's speaking to
                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                          assuming this was the same bill: @WoodBIOMASS/1519780819677577217
                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                        .@DMoKreis supports the committee amendment; that's good: @DMoKreis/1518963605684817922
                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                      Sen. Shaheen has been on the issue of keeping it going for awhile now: @SenatorShaheen/1281330796566138882
                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                  ...actually since 2012: @SenatorShaheen/259334013519552512
                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                              ...and also Kelly Ayotte, so I guess the tradition of taking pictures at it is bipartisan: @burgessev/319480309928325120
                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                            ah apparently 2012 was when it was built: @NHAFLCIO/179941263850745857
                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                          Oh right in 2013 people still had to do RTs/QTs with a manual "RT"; here's the original of the Burgess Everett RT above: @KellyAyotte/319479382483795969
                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                        anyways try searching "Burgess BioPower" on here; you can get a pretty decent history of it just from what's been tweeted
                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                      Current bill: SB424, about so-called "Renewable Natural Gas" (methane recovery from landfills). Rep. Somssich moves to table.
                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                    anyways it's lunchtime now
                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                  k we're back now; still in the SciTech bills
                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                .@JackieCinMHT speaks about SB448, an energy use reduction bill for state agencies.
                                oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                              "most of us here drove here today" ...well, I didn't! I walked! (lol I realize I'm probably the only exception here)
                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                            GOP are being anti-EVs, as usual
                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                          Republicans continue to prove they are against energy efficiency, by killing SB448
                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                        redistricting time
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                      Max Abramson is actually opposing his own party on gerrymandering here, but of course he has to get in digs against Dems while he's at it
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    ok for some reason he had to explain the character "Kenny" from South Park while he was at it, too
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  Ross Berry is now speaking about his map; I really don't like how Concord and Manchester are stuck together with it...
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                Concord gets to be the dominant city in our district under the current arrangement (yes Nashua is bigger but it's less centrally-located), and I don't want to give that up to Manchester. Keep us separate.
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              (this is all being done as an amendment to SB200, btw, which was originally just about the election of district commissioners in Haverhill)
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            Majority committee amendment (Rep. Berry's map) is adopted; time to see if we can replace it with the minority amendment (a least-changes map that moves just one town)
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          minority amendment is rejected... hm, I thought there might also be a floor amendment before voting on the entire bill?
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        I guess Rep. Abramson gave up on his floor amendment...
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      SB200 passes along party lines; let's hope Gov. Sununu sticks by his threat to veto...
  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
    Next: SB447 from Transportation, an electric vehicle and infrastructure fund.
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      SB447 is tabled; Republicans continue to suppress electric vehicles.
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        3 more bills from the regular calendar, all from Ways and Means, before we get to bills removed from the consent calendar.
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          Current bill: SB318, "extending the hours in which games of chance may be conducted" (which means gambling)
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            Sue Almy speaking to her amendment to SB318... something about "Poker Palaces"...
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              debate over whether to call them "Poker Palaces" or "Charitable Gaming Locations"
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                amendment replaces the entire bill, apparently
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  Rep. Almy's amendment fails; SB318 passes unamended.
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    current bill: SB435, a tweak to the Business Profits Tax
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                      SB435 passes on voice vote; time for bills removed from the consent calendar
                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                        Rep. Osborne moves to table SB399, which passed unanimously out of committee and was on the consent calendar, but was removed only so we could amend it in response to Alito's leaked SCOTUS opinion.
                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                          we tried to special-order this bill to yesterday: @cooljeanius/1521921243326435328
                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                              Rep. Osborne yesterday: "You'll just have to wait until tomorrow!" Rep. Osborne today: "lol just kidding; you'll actually have to wait indefinitely"
                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                SB399 is tabled along party lines; oh well...
                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                  Current bill: SB429, which Rep. Oxenham removed from the consent calendar to introduce a floor amendment to. It's about the Site Evaluation Committee.
                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                    am so confused
                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                      argle bargle
                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                        Final(?) bill: SB316, on lucky 7 licenses... goes by on voice vote
                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                          3rd reading motion; I actually opposed it this time since I thought some people might want to remove some things from the table, but 3rd reading motions always pass, so, nvm
                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                            .@mannyfornh giving a unanimous consent speech about Cinco de Mayo, which is actually in memorial of the Battle of Puebla, *not* Mexican Independence Day!
                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                              .@rosemarierung has a unanimous consent speech for Teacher Appreciation Week.
                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                ok we're done now