-
This is like the 1 single instance where I’d consider voting for libertarians to be acceptable. Reasoning: - Dems aren’t fielding our own candidates - It’s County Attorney & County Treasurer - Sarwark & Manzo are the type of wokertarians/cosmotarians that the Mises Caucus hates @nsarwark/1569387797483589633Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 6 Retweets
❤️ 12 Favorites
Mood 0
-
Note that ALL 3 of these criteria have to be true for me to consider voting for a libertarian. In a race with no D where the choices are a moderate R versus a Mises Caucus Libertarian, I'd vote for the Republican in that case.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
Actually let me broaden my second criterion a bit: I'd include County Sheriff as a position that it's acceptable to write certain libertarians in for, too (in fact I'd even put sheriff ahead of treasurer in a rank-order of positions I'd accept libertarians for)Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +3 🙂
-
Ranking of positions on a New Hampshire ballot based on how likely I’d be to accept a libertarian for them: 1. County Attorney 2. Sheriff 3. County Treasurer 4. maaaybe Register of Probate, but that might be coming off the ballot in the future if a certain CACR passes this Nov.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
(and then there’s no 5; nothing after 4) Why just Register of Probate, and not Register of Deeds, you might ask? Well, it’s simple: Register of Deeds deals with property ownership, and property rights are one of the areas where I have the sharpest disagreements with libertarians.On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -1 🙁