cooljeanius’s avatarcooljeanius’s Twitter Archive—№ 71,783

                                  1. a bit late for the House Session today; will be livetweeting from everything after the introduction of guests. Clerk is reading a resignation letter from a Representative. #NHPolitics
                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                  Benjamin T. Bartlett was the resigning rep, for reference
                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                I've got a new seatmate: @HeathHowardNH! Not quite sure what happened to my previous seatmate...
                                oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                              Since we're in crossover now, we're now in the part of the year where we have to worry about merge conflicts with bills from the "other body" on the same topic of bills we already passed through this chamber
                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                            now up: Rep. Luneau speaking against SB77, another GOP attempt to give a handout to private schools
                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                          Rep. Ladd mentioned No Child Left Behind; boooo! He's trying to distinguish here between "manifest hardship placement" and the EFA things, which would be more convincing if the GOP weren't also trying to expand EFAs as well.
                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                        OTP on SB77 passes 187-183; looks like we have a number of absences today...
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                      Next up is SB152, relative to New Hampshire workforce training programs. Rep. Belcher is trying to amend the bill to strip out the offshore wind training portions.
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    good grief this is some FUD about windmills
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  Rep. Ladd is now speaking against Rep. Belcher's amendment, so this is a GOP v. GOP debate
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                oh hey it's that glitch where results are displayed live again
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              Belcher Amendment is rejected 122-151; onto debate on the underlying bill
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            Oh, so there IS actually a motion to divide the question under Mason's Manual! I thought that was just a Robert's Rules thing; it was a motion that got used a lot during the previous DSA convention...
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          I'll have to read the RSA that Rep. Hoell was referencing, as there have been things I've wanted to divide the question on before, too... @nhhouseclerk can you remind me which one it was again?
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        motion to divide the question fails 118-255; *now* we're moving on to the underlying bill
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      Ref. for usage of the "divide the question" motion during the 2021 DSA convention: @cooljeanius/1421912605531254797
  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
      SB152 passes OTP 250-123; hooray for workforce training! Now @RepWilhelm moves to table SB155, relative to the adoption of SAU budgets.
      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
        Rep. Ladd is speaking in favor of the tabling motion; Alicia Lekas opposes it (GOP v. GOP debate)
        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
          SB155 is tabled 252-120; that's it for Education bills
          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
            next up is SCR1, affirming the general courts for NH's #FITN primary. Rep. Ammon is speaking in favor of it, so a number of members are using this opportunity to "take a walk"
            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
              what I'm wondering is, the body on the other side of the wall has a rule against taking up HCRs (House Concurrent Resolutions), so why don't we have a similar rule against SCRs (Senate Concurrent Resolutions) on this side of the wall?
              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                We could have had chances to improve our state's diversity, but Republicans have generally opposed attempts to do so. I do want to stay #FITN, but we'd have a better chance of doing so if we'd taken the critiques about diversity more seriously.
                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                  Imagine if we'd elected a Black SoS; we'd have the "Why are you taking the #FITN primary away from being run by a Black SoS to give to a white one (SC's)?" argument available to us, but the GOP denied us that opportunity by electing Scanlan instead: @cooljeanius/1598488083552428033
                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                    my own diversity bill was HB64, for reference, but instead of expanding the Commission on Demographics' duties, the GOP voted to eliminate the Commission instead: @cooljeanius/1636430592915939328
                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                      Most GOP Reps voted against the bill to ban racial profiling earlier this term; if they'd really wanted to help keep NH's primary #FITN, they would have supported it: @cooljeanius/1636383399886848001
                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                        yeah the HB64 hearing was February 16th: @cooljeanius/1626254275994066949
                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                          Anyways SCR1 passed OTP 356-6; we're now onto bills from ED&A. Rep. Santonastaso is now speaking against SB149, relative to nurse agencies.
                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                            Now @CandaceforNH is also speaking against SB149; she is actually a nurse, so I trust her voice on this issue.
                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                              Yeah the real issue here is that we ought to be paying nurses more, but of course, this being New Hampshire, where paying for anything is verboten, that option is off the table here.
                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                Rep. Osborne moves to table; I'll support this motion
                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                  just pay the increase in taxes so that nurses can be paid more; stop trying to cheap out on things
                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                    motion to table passes 199-173; that was ED&A's only bill today, so next is Fish & Game's bill: SB14, relative to the use of game cameras
                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                      I mentioned it earlier this morning: @cooljeanius/1654066276107427840
                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                        amendment 1520h is adopted on voice vote; now Rep. Hynes moves to table the underlying bill
                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                          SB14 passes OTPA on voice vote; everyone laughs as a baby cries
                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                            Next are the ST&E bills: first is SB52, relative to the regulation and operation of EV charging stations. Rep. Vose is speaking against an amendment to it.
                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                              vote on amendment 1401h results in a tie, 183-183, so it fails to be adopted. Onto debate on the underlying bill (SB52)
                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                Now @thcormen is speaking in favor of SB52. Let's build more EV infrastructure!
                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                  Rep. Hoell is moving to table
                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                    motion to table SB52 fails 183-188; onto the OTP motion on it
                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                      Good PI from @WendyENThomas in favor of SB52!
                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                        SB52 passes OTP 187-184; doing the "reconsider and vote no" dance now to lock it in
                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                          Ok SB52 is locked in by a similar margin. Now we're on SB69, a nice bill on net metering. Rep. Berezhny is speaking against it.
                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                            Now speaking: @ChrisMunsforNH in favor of SB69. Let's go, net metering!
                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                              Since Rep. Muns usually sits in front of me, him being up to speak gives me a bit more room to stretch my arms forward to get a better picture... still kind of far away here, though...
                                                              oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                OTP on SB69 fails with a 186-186 tie; trying to table next
                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                  tabling motion succeeded 190-181, so SB69 is "saved" so that it can come back later
                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                    Next is SB79, another net-metering bill. Difference between this one and the previous one (SB69) is that that one was for nonprofits, while this one is for businesses
                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                      SB79 passes OTP 194-179; good to have at least ONE of the net-metering bills pass... personally I would have preferred it be the other one, but it's better than if neither had passed...
                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                        preference order: 1. both SB69 and SB79 pass 2. only SB69 passes 3. only SB79 passes 4. neither bill passes
                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                          Now up: SB167, relative to green hydrogen energy and infrastructure. @TonyNh is speaking in favor of it.
                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                            SB167 fails by a single vote (187-186); stuff going by quickly on voice votes now
                                                                            1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                              GOP are trying to add language from HB31 to SB15 via an amendment
                                                                              1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                this was HB31, for reference: @cooljeanius/1633851202713665540
                                                                                1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                  I think we managed to defeat that amendment? Anyways, third reading motion now
                                                                                  1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                    UNH is having an event on the State House lawn next
                                                                                    1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                      ah, we finally got some clarification about the National Anthem! "Special guest singer" means don't sing along; "is now leading us" means DO sing along
                                                                                      1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                        Unanimous Consent speech about Ukrainian refugees in Poland currently
                                                                                        1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                          next UC speech: SAU21 (Winnacunnet) now has an auditorium named after Renny Cushing
                                                                                          1. …in reply to @cooljeanius
                                                                                            ok time to go